By Alain Jehlen
Although the Obama Administration continues to press for more charter schools, a new study finds many of these schools avoid the students who most need help.
The study, from New York State United Teachers, the state affiliate of both NEA and the American Federation of Teachers, also uncovered rampant misuse of funds and conflicts of interest in New York charter schools.
The report, available online, is the latest, but not the first to find that many charter schools have fewer at-risk students than district public schools. A study by Kathy Skinner of the Massachusetts Teachers Association came to similar conclusions through an analysis of enrollment numbers in Boston charter schools.
NYSUT presented its findings at a New York Senate hearing proposals for improving the state’s charter school law. The law says charter schools should develop new approaches to teaching with “special emphasis on expanded learning experience for students who are at-risk of academic failure.” The study found that far from focusing on at-risk students, most charter schools fend them off.
Ed Bradley, president of the South Buffalo Charter School Union, told the senators that his own school “has gone from being a community school with a warm atmosphere of teaching all kids to a cold, corporate model that filters low-performing, tardy, and behavioral problem children from the school.”
The NYSUT report found that, on average, New York charter schools enroll fewer than half as many special education students as district schools, and also far fewer English language learners. The researchers showed that many students are pushed out of charter schools and back into district schools for misbehavior or because they are not expected to do well on tests.
But the report notes that these conclusions do not apply to all charter schools. Some do design their programs for at-risk students.
NYSUT is backing legislation that would require charter schools to enroll as many at-risk students as district schools.
The financial irregularities described in the study were discovered through extensive use of the state Freedom Of Information Law to pry financial documents from reluctant charter operators. Those documents revealed blatant irregularities and conflicts of interest in some schools. For example, one Brooklyn charter school is the financial parent of a bridal boutique operated by the charter school’s founder and board president, and appears from the documents to have taken on financial liability for the boutique. Several other schools gave lucrative contracts to board members.
NYSUT wants charter schools subject to the same level of financial auditing that applies to district schools.
NYSUT, which represents some charter school teachers, says it is not opposed to charter schools or to lifting the cap on the number of charter schools, but wants them held to the same standards as district schools before the cap is raised.
“This review of public records came in response to concerns voiced by teachers, in some cases with their jobs on the line, who raised important questions about charter management practices,” the report says.
“Quality charter schools have much to gain from reforming the law to ensure all charter operators are fair in admitting and serving students, and accurate and transparent in reporting.”