Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Retired Educators Taking Action on Social Security

October 29, 2010 by cmccabe  
Filed under Featured News, Social Security, State News, Top Stories

Share

By Cynthia McCabe

NEA members concerned about getting back in retirement the money they earned during their public service careers plan to take action next month to ensure that happens.

On Dec. 1, a bipartisan group will release recommendations that could have a far-reaching impact on the retirement of educators and other public servants. That group, called the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, must identify steps that could improve the fiscal health of the nation.

Some members of the Commission have already publicly stated their desire to cut Social Security — a move that could spell long-term problems.

“Excessive fear of debt and a zeal for debt reduction without careful consideration of the consequences can lead to hasty, rash decisions that could seriously undermine public policy for decades to come,” NEA labor economist David Schlein said in testifying to the commission in June.

He pointed to historic examples after World War II in the U.S. and Great Britain when some of the most significant economic growth of those countries came during periods of relatively high debt.

Today, Social Security has a surplus of $2.6 trillion and does not contribute to the national deficit.  Yet the retirement age has already been raised from 65 to 66, and it will go to 67 in 2022. Some in Congress have proposed raising it to 70, which would mean a 20 percent cut in benefits.

NEA is stressing to the National Commission that it must protect the money that educators earned. It’s also pressing for the repeal of the Government Pension Offset and the Windfall Elimination Provision, which penalize some public employees by cutting or eliminating Social Security benefits that they or their spouse have earned.

Like widow Lynn Brooks Hunt (above), who retired after 30 years in Maine classrooms, and now works two jobs because of her paltry Social Security payment. Hunt was 45 when her husband died at age 53. She’s entitled to $1,700 a month in spousal benefits but because she was a teacher it’s reduced to $188 a month.

“I told both of my kids, ‘Don’t go into teaching.,’”’ Hunt says. (Read more of Hunt’s story and others like hers in This Active Life, the magazine for NEA-Retired members.)

In July, members of a commission-monitoring task force created by NEA met with the commission’s executive director, sharing NEA members’ Social Security priorities, and NEA testified before the commission and submitted written testimony to it this summer.

It joined Social Security Works and its related Strengthen Social Security Coalition, a group of more than 60 organizations representing 30 million members dedicated to strengthening Social Security.

And NEA’s efforts are already paying dividends. A group of U.S House members wrote to President Obama this summer opposing Social Security cuts.

Now the Association’s 275,000 retired members are mobilizing, visiting the Legislative Action Center at nea.org/lac to contact commission members and urge them to repeal GPO/WEP and protect and strengthen Social Security. And they’re signing the Strengthen Social Security Coalition petition to the Commission at strengthensocialsecurity.org.

Photos: Kevin Brusie (Hunt); Sara Robertson (Van Roekel)

Comments

5 Responses to “Retired Educators Taking Action on Social Security”
  1. Thank you for continuing to bring information about the WEP/GPO Offsets.
    As a Kentucky teacher, this will also affect me greatly if I ever have the chance to retire. As a KEA KEPAC member, I have addressed this issue with members. Sadly, many are not informed or concerned about Social Security Offsets. If everyone visiting the NEA website, could reach out to only 5 people in your state affected by the Offsets,, we could make a difference in Washington. Just say no to apathy! It may be YOU affected in the future.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  2. Harry Thompson says:

    Re: Strenghten Socialist Insecurity, NEA president on shooting of Rep Giffords

    Cynthia, please connect the political dots, & do the job the media elites won`t do, as they reported on the tragic shooting in Tucson, reporting how an aide to Giffords, Gabe Zimmerman, was killed, but failed to mention that he became a victim of the FICA Death Tax, bilked out of his FICA `contributions,` because he had no elgible survivors.
    The NEA has a right to promote strenghtening Socialist Insecurity, but I hope you`ll remind readers to this potential fraud in their future, & how their hard-earned money could be forfeited to the government`s official Ponzi scheme, should they becaome victims of the FICA Death Tax.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  3. andrea Murray says:

    I would like to ask congress to define the word “Windfall”. What part of that word applies to a pension from another country that the person worked hard for and PAID taxes to that country on. What right does Congress have to take almost half of the social security monthly payment from someone just because that person worked hard all their life and deserves to have their pensions from both countries paid to them in FULL. This is nothing short of stealing and I hope all the rich politicians are proud of the part they played in doing this to hard working people.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  4. Maryjane Stafford says:

    Why does the WPA and the GPO only affect teachers in 14 (?) states and not all 50? How can my state earnings (Maine State Retirement) impact my federal social security benefit? I would just like to understand the logic. I’m thinking that money had to change hands at the beginning so that Maine threw its teachers under the bus for a lump sum of money.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Audrey Hopkins says:

    Thank you for continuing to fight for our right to collect the money we paid into social security. I started teaching when I was forty,and I’m entitled to and deserve the money I paid into the system before I began. I only get half though, because I taught in Ohio,and California until retirement. Where’s the justice in that? If I’d taught in any of the other 45 states which don’t punish teachers, I’d have over $600 more a month to enjoy. Unfortunately, no one told me about this little “windfall” before I opted to be an educator in one of the 15 “loser” states.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!