Monday, July 28, 2014

Why a 401(k) is No Replacement for a Pension

March 23, 2012 by twalker  
Filed under Featured News, Top Stories

Share

By Cindy Long

Longtime friends Brenda Brum and Dolores Townsend have a lot in common. They both like antiquing and poking around flea markets. They both care for an elderly parent. They both taught at the same school. And they both avoided a financial debacle that would have forced them to keep working well past retirement age.

Brum and Townsend live in West Virginia, the state that until a few years ago had the worst-funded pension plan in the entire country. By the early 1990s, the plan was on the verge of collapse with just 14 percent of the money needed to cover the pensions it owed teachers.

In 1990, then-Governor Gaston Caperton signed legislation to pay off the pension liabilities over a 40-year period. But it also changed the plan from a defined benefit (DB) pension to a defined contribution (DC) 401(k)-type plan.

Effective July of 1991, West Virginia’s new teacher hires were placed into the DC plan. Educators hired prior to that date were able to choose to enroll in the new 401(k)-type plan or to stay with the pension. Lured by the possibility of huge investment returns instead of a lower, but steady, pension income, many made the switch.

But not Brenda Brum or Dolores Townsend — they opted to stick with the pension, and now they’re counting their blessings rather than the number of years to retirement.

Dolores Townsend and Brenda Brum

“I have colleagues who changed to the DC plan and they have to keep on working,” says Townsend, who retired in 2009. “They’ve been ready to retire, but they lost all their 401(k) savings in the crash of 2008, and now they can’t afford to retire.”

Turns out they wouldn’t have been able to afford to retire before the crash either.

By 2008, according to a study done by West Virginia’s Consolidated Public Retirement Board, most teachers age 60 or older who participated in the 401(k) had only $100,000 or less in their accounts – a fraction of what the pension would have provided them, and not nearly enough to retire on and remain self-sufficient.

“In West Virginia, a lot of people think $100,000 is a lot of money. Teacher salaries have always been so low, people have a distorted view about how much is enough to live on,” says Brum, who retired in 2011. “But most people live 18 to 20 years after they retire, and how can you stretch $100,000 over that time? The only option is not to live as long!”

According to West Virginia Education Association Executive Director David Haney, the DC plan “failed in every way, shape and form.”

He gives an example of a woman who retired on the pension plan at age 60 after 30 years of service. Over those 30 years, she’d contributed $51,604 to her pension (despite common misperceptions that taxpayers fund pensions, they’re actually a shared responsibility with employee contributions and investment earnings doing most of the work).  The plan’s benefit formula is 2 percent of final average salary times years of employment. The woman’s final salary was about $45,000 a year, so her pension is $2,261 a month. To earn the same amount in the DC plan, she would have had to amass $323,400 in her 401(k) – a hefty sum compared to $51,604, and a long shot given the ups and downs of a volatile market.

401(k)s Weren’t Meant to Replace Pensions

Defined contribution 401(k) plans were never intended to be a pension replacement for employees. They were originally created as a perk for highly paid executives, and were originally called “salary reduction plans” before being renamed for the tax code that makes them possible. The thinking was, the more these executives were paid, the more they could afford to contribute from their paychecks, and the more they had for retirement – on top of the old stand-by pension and Social Security. Another perk was that DC plans are portable – convenient for executives who climb the corporate ladder from one company to another.

It all sounds pretty good when the markets are hot and delivering high returns, which is why so many working Americans – executives or not — clamored to get in on the 401(k) action starting in the 1980s. But what happens when the bottom falls out like it did in 2008?

People lose money. Lots of money. And moderately paid public employees like teachers who spent their entire careers serving the public in the classroom are suddenly unable to retire after their 401(k) has been decimated by a market crash.

Pensions Provide Secure – and Higher — Retirement Benefits

For years, David Haney and WVEA members lobbied the West Virginia government to overhaul the plan and return to a pension system that provided secure retirement benefits and was managed – and funded — properly. They pointed out the discrepancies between the defined benefit and defined contribution plans, showing why the pension plan offered a much better retirement benefit for employees and major cost savings for the state.

Finally, the retirement board’s actuary provided some facts that backed them up.

The actuary discovered that savings rates in the DC plan did, in fact, lag far behind monthly benefits that the DB plan would pay. The DC plan members, including new hires and those who made the switch in 1991, had an average of $33,944 in their accounts by June of 2005. Those over age 60 had an average of just $23,193 – a trifling amount to spread out over the rest of their lives in retirement. On the other hand, teacher participants in the DB plan, earning the average salary after 30 years of service, would receive an annual pension of $27,000. They wouldn’t have to figure out how to make it last. They’d get that $27,000 each and every year of their retirement, whether they lived to be 68 or 108.

The government saw the red ink writing on the wall, and in 2008, West Virginia agreed to switch back to a DB plan.

Here’s why they made the switch and why other states should follow suit.

DB Plan Investments Are Managed By Financial Experts

Over a 30-year period, according to a study by the National Institute for Retirement Security and consulting firm Milliman Inc.,  defined benefit plans delivered an almost 25 percent greater return to participants than defined contribution plans.

One reason for the higher returns is because DB plans ’ investments are professionally managed day-to-day by investment experts rather than individually managed by people whose investment tools consist of little more than a crystal ball and a lot of luck – which is all West Virginia investors had to rely on.

“The DC plan participants received absolutely no education on how to manage their investments,” says Haney.

Like many public employees in states with DC  plans, the West Virginia educators received no web-based courses, no seminars, no written materials, and no access to consultants. They couldn’t even get reports on how their investments were doing more than once a quarter, and then had only a very short window in which to change their allocations.

“Do most classroom teachers, bus drivers, and cafeteria workers know what their risk tolerance is, or about their time horizons? Do they know the difference between fixed securities and equity securities, or max cap versus mid cap? Do they know whether they should they invest internationally, or in growth stocks, or derivatives?,” asks Haney.

We can’t reasonably expect the average employee to effectively manage her savings with absolutely no training when even some winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics admit to making mistakes, either by not paying enough attention to their own retirement arrangements or by making bad decisions when they do.

“I think very little about my retirement savings, because I know that thinking could make me poorer or more miserable or both,” 2002 Economics Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman of Princeton University told the Los Angeles Times .

DB Plans Lower Costs With Pooled Risks

DB plans are pooled and therefore have “built-in” savings that allow them to deliver retirement benefits at a lower cost to the employer as well as the employee.

First, they average risks over a large number of participants. Instead of requiring contributions substantial enough to provide retirement income through a person’s maximum life expectancy, which, with the miracle of modern medicine, could be upwards of age 90 or even 100, defined benefit plans only need to fund benefits through the average life expectancy of the group. So when a pension member or their designated beneficiary  dies prematurely, the assets that have been accumulated on their behalf are used to provide benefits to the remaining employees.

Also, with pooled funds, the management fees are lower than maintaining hundreds or thousands of individual accounts, which result in a 26 percent cost savings, according to the National Institute on Retirement Security.

DB Plans Don’t Age

Also, unlike defined contribution plans, pension assets can be diversified for optimal returns throughout an employee’s lifetime. People with 401(k)s, on the other hand, are advised to move their investments into safer, lower-returning assets as they age and approach retirement.  But because DB plans pool the risks of losses, they can maintain an investment mix that is diversified among stocks, bonds, and other investments, increasing the investment returns and lowering required contributions.

DB Plans Boost the Economy

According to an analysis of 20 million 401(k) participants conducted by the Employee Benefit Research Institute and the Investment Company Institute, the median account balance of a worker in his or her 60?s, making between $40,000 and $60,000 a year was $97,588 at the end of 2006. That amount would generate about $8,000 a year in retirement income.

“How can someone live on that amount,” asks Haney. “They’d struggle just to pay utilities and to put food on the table. They’d probably become wards of the state.”

In fact, research shows that when older Americans can’t be self-sufficient in retirement, taxpayers face higher public assistance costs.

But when they’re on a fixed income pension, retirees represent a vital, continuous source of spending. A National Institute for Retirement Security study shows that public employee retirees pump $358 billion into local economies and help to create 2.5 million jobs.

They can afford home maintenance , they can buy a new car, or, like West Virginia retired educator Dolores Townsend, they can go on a vacation.

“I don’t have to scrimp and save because I’m worried my retirement benefit will run out,” says Townsend. “When everything else fluctuates, like gas, groceries, and prescriptions, it’s nice to know my paycheck won’t, so I can plan for my expenses and then spend what’s left on the fun stuff, like a new pair of shoes or a ski trip with my nephews.”

Haney says the rest of the country can benefit from what West Virginia learned the hard way – that individual 401(k) accounts. which were only intended to supplement pensions, have proven to be an insufficient primary source of retirement income, that pensions are more economically efficient, and can provide the same retirement benefit at half the cost.

“Given the growing level of retirement insecurity, our nation should be looking at ways to get back to basics and ensure that all Americans have access to adequate and secure pensions,” he says. “Part of the American dream is that after a life of hard work and playing by the rules, people should be able to retire with dignity and security.”

Top Photo: Michele Coleman

Comments

19 Responses to “Why a 401(k) is No Replacement for a Pension”
  1. todd says:

    Congratulations for yourselves! What about the younger workers? So if they lose and the elderly who had better choices win, what are they truly winning? Whom did they educate? What or whom will watch and control wall street and what was once conservative investing? How did Barnanke get reappointed is the all time biggest question, since he/it orchestrated the total collapse for workers and still continually suggests damning ideas. (period)
    PS YOUR IDIOTIC CODE PHRASE HAS SLASHES THRU NUMBERS AND LETTERS AS IF THEY SHOULD BE IGNORED BUT IF IGNORED THE ENTRY FAILS, SO I’LL IGNORE THE “X”ed OUT CHARACTERS AND WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS? (another wall street guess)

    Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 14

  2. Maria Ky says:

    Great article! It should help any reader understand the vast difference between DB and DC as well as why Defined Benefit is the only way to go.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 8

  3. Anne Payton says:

    Regarding the quote by Daniel Kahneman about his retirement savings, it should be pointed out that Kahnerman is not an economist. He is a psychologist, who studies the psychology of judgement and decision making and the psychology of economics. He is the only psychologist to win a Nobel Prize for Economics, which, while impressive, does not make him an authority on retirement planning. I was disappointed that “Pensions” author, Long, did not clarify this point. His comment reflects his professional point of view, that worrying about his pension could make him “poorer or more miserable or both.”

    Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 8

  4. Doreen says:

    I am a retiree from the state of Rhode Island collecting a very modest pension which HAD a guaranteed cost of living adjustment each year and I am not eligible for Social Security. The state mismanaged our retirement fund and they tell us it is underfunded so the plan has been decimated by the state government. I may never have an increase in what I receive and might very well be well below the poverty line over time. Apparently there will be legal action by unions on behalf of current employees, but I was told by my former union that they will not be representing retirees… That really hurts. I paid thousand of dollars and dues over the years.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 4

  5. Vincent Gabbeart says:

    In less than two weeks, your time for assessing your options outlined in the General Motors Pension Buyout Plan will be over. The offer from GM, announced on June 1, presented you with three choices: to take a lump-sum payment, to continue a monthly benefit, or to take on a new sort of monthly benefit. From the start it has been strongly encouraged that you meet with a financial advisor experienced in the areas of retirement and investment planning. Additionally, you can watch this video which may help to shed some light on the three available options: http://youtu.be/32ZRne7AoTQ. You’ve had time to think about your pension options, now is the time to act.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  6. John says:

    I also live in a state where the pension fund has been mishandled. Kentucky politicians have “borrowed” from our pension fund for years, and now that the debt is great, they say our pensions are “unsustainable.” There is much talk about state employee “shared sacrifice.”

    Now that they’ve wasted our money, where is THEIR sacrifice? As a software developer already making half what my peers make in private industry, I am so discouraged that the public and politicians do not respect my work and my career. Yet people still talk about my “gold-plated” retirement. Is it gold-plated that I will retire on $30,000 a year, IF they don’t destroy my plan first? The very plan that they agreed to offer me upon employment; part of my “involatile contract” that apparently is more volatile than it’s supposed to be, since they’re trying to take it away.

    It’s very discouraging. I regret coming to state government and will not recommend it to my children. I cannot urge you strongly enough, if you are looking for a long-term career, to stay away from government work. Do not believe all the articles you read about people retiring at $100,000 a year. That’s nothing but a dream to the average employee. Only the upper-crust, the politican appointees, do that.

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

  7. M. Jacobs says:

    What about all the Pensions that get raided, or voided outright when they are mismanaged and/or the company goes belly up? If you start early enough and keep up with it, a DC plan with a reputable place like TIAA-CREF seems safer to me.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2

  8. Matthew Hall says:

    $670.84 per month invested at the S&P 500 average return from 1991 to 2008 (8.06%) would yield the $323,400 that the article says is the amount necessary to provide $2,261 per month in retirement benefits via a 401k. That is $144,900.79 that the employee contributed to their 401k.

    The public employee pensioner put in $51,604 over the same time ($238.91/month) to yield the same monthly income. The article also says that, “despite common misperceptions [sic] that taxpayers fund pensions, they’re actually a shared responsibility with employee contributions and investment earnings doing most of the work.” That means that the government pension earned 16.719% return over the same period.

    This is a lie…just so you know.

    So, while I agree, that if I were a public employee, I would resist 401k’s like they were the plague, it is not reasonable to argue that they are not extravagant taxpayer obligations or that “the employee contributions and investment earnings do most of the work.”.:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  9. Jeremy in Idaho says:

    Pensions have draw backs if they are not properly funded and legally secured, hence strong oversight of such trusts are required. Simple rules on preserving a trust during times of bankruptcies of all chapters, and ensuring proper actuary calculations for dues is a must. As well as requirements toward pensions to be either transferable which is difficult to impossible, or better to require intermediary vesting stages– every 5 years vesting periods and corresponding incremental percentage of payout until the max vesting stage is reached, or is locked in at the most recent vesting stage regardless of continued employment.
    401K grossly lack ability to take the place of a pension. For a 401K to be even closely competitive to taking the place of a pension, it would require not just matching employee contribution, but triple or quadruple matching employee contribution, leaving the standard 4% to 8% income matching amounts. Especially under today’s wage constraints involving very bad foreign trade agreements in our country in relationship to production ability and capacity within our own nation that allows for strong buying power, as well as a harsh disruption to adopt living standards that are lesser and dictated by foreign nations: we cannot control their minimum standards nor can we control their subsidies that make internal businesses artificially less competitive. Declining wages do not allow a person to set aside more money. And rising prices make it ever difficult to set aside even more money.

    Many people in my generation who have no pension options will find retirement impossible. Around 2040, expect welfare expenses to increase extremely high if the US retirement structure isn’t addressed.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. Shane says:

    If you have the choice and you’re trying to decide between DC and DB plans, do yourself a favor and compare your own personal numbers. For the DB plan, calculate using your state’s formula for service years times salary. For DC plans, use an online investment calculator. Make an informed choice for yourself.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Connie Hughes says:

    Who is paying for guaranteed public pensions? Worker’s in the private sector who have a 401k that is subject to the market. Why should public employees be protected? If our legislatures also had 401k retirement funds, maybe they would work harder to make the economy work for everyone. As mentioned below, a 401k contributor has to put much more of their salary away earn what a public pension pays. In my state, teachers after 35 years of teaching can easily earn 90% of the average of their last 3 years for their pension. PA is bankrupt on paper because of pensions and our legislatures are afraid to do anything about it because their pensions might be next. Our school taxes have gone up for the last 3 years, while at the same time we are laying off teachers. It’s a crime against our kids and their parents!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. 6% to the country’s GDP. The organization’s president, Adam Posen recently
    health quarters had a piece featured in New Your Times Magazine.
    There are literally hundreds of technical indicators available, but
    there are also a wide selection of clients there is little point in
    going to the movies is around $40.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. These significant changes give an opening to a market of specialists when it
    comes to tax preparation, auditing and bookkeeping. Prepare an application for Tax-ID number, if needed.

    Other coins were surmised to have been issued by employers,
    noblemen and merchants for their private uses.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. These significant changes give an opening to a market of
    specialists when it comes to tax preparation, auditing and bookkeeping.
    The beginning is rather simple: accept that you cannot
    do everything for your business. The online offering will cost you $99 to setup up with
    monthly fees.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. Replacing the wax ring is a lot less difficult and
    expensive than replacing the toilet, but if you have
    wanted a new commode, this is your chance. The kitchen and bathroom are the places that
    we hang out in, at the end of a hard day. Simply feed the auger into
    the pipe until the snake meets the obstruction.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] pension is switched for the promise of a market-driven defined contribution savings plan. This article in neatoday (National Education Association) relates the story of friends Brenda Brum and Dolores [...]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

  2. [...] more here: Why a 401(k) is No Replacement for a Pension | NEA Today This entry is filed under [...]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3

  3. [...] A few more viewpoints: Defined Benefit or 401K Pension vs. 401k Why a 401(k) is No Replacement for a Pension | NEA Today From the final article: Defined contribution 401(k) plans were never intended to be a pension [...]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. [...] This gentleman’s opinion came as no surprise to me. There are still thousands of people both old and young that think that a pension is better than a 401k plan. [...]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!