Why Girls Are Outperforming Boys in School
March 5, 2013 by twalker
Filed under Featured News, Top Stories
By Mary Ellen Flannery
All-boy classrooms, more male teachers, and longer hours on the playground — these are often suggested answers to improving male achievement in school and close the gender gap in education. But they’re misguided ones that assume all boys have the same needs and that they’re different from the needs of girls, said the authors of a new book, The Rise of Women: The Growing Gender Gap in Education and What It Means for American Schools.
Instead, what research shows to be helpful for boys—and all kids—is school-wide focus on academic achievement. “Our research shows that boys will compete for good grades and often achieve them in schools where academic effort is expected and valued,” said co-author Claudia Buchmann, sociology professor at Ohio State University.
It’s also very important, she noted, for teachers and parents to make it clear to students that their hard work in middle and high school leads to success in college and well-paid careers. Girls seem to understand this. But boys…not so much. And it’s a growing problem for them—and our nation.
In 2010, the college completion rate for men was just 27 percent — not much better than it was 40 years ago. But, for women, it was 36 percent, up from 14 percent in 1970. “We’ve seen astonishing change over a very short period of history,” said co-author Thomas DiPrete, a Columbia University sociologist.
The road to success in college starts early—and girls have taken the lead from the very start. At every grade, from kindergarten on, girls have better social and behavioral skills than boys, and they earn better grades. But are the girls just plain smarter? No, not according to researchers. Girls and boys have very similar rates of intelligence. But girls do work harder—and their hard work pays off.
“It isn’t about ability. It’s about effort and engagement in school,” Buchmann said. Girls are more likely to say they like school and that good grades are important to them. And their motivation translates into effort: Girls are more likely than boys to spend time studying. “Success in academics, like success in sports, requires a big investment in time and effort. The more you practice, the better you become,” Buchmann said.
Boys, on the other hand, are more likely to say that they’re going to make a lot of money even without education. They’re overly optimistic. And the problem is worse for boys with less-educated fathers. They’re even less likely to get good grades or graduate from high school. “They may hold out-dated views of masculinity—that it’s more about physical strength,” said Buchmann.
The consequences for men are clear: You need a college diploma to get a well-paid job these days. And folks without degrees are twice as likely to be unemployed in today’s economy. “Men’s failure to get more education limits income gains for them and their families,” said DiPrete. What’s more, it also is slowing the nation’s economic growth, he added. The United States is falling behind other nations in terms of college completion, and the small number of male college graduates is a key contributor to the problem.
Of course, women still have to overcome obstacles. They still earn less money: an average 82 cents for every dollar earned by a man. And they’re still too often closed out of science and technology fields. “Men and women still largely educate themselves in different fields—with dramatic consequences across their lifetimes,” said Philip Cohen, a University of Maryland-College Park professor of sociology.
But the strategies that work best with boys would also work well for women, the researchers said. “Schools should set high expectations, and treat students as individuals…not part of a gendered group,” Buchmann said. “These same reforms will also help girls.”
Related posts:

The authors make a good point that good instruction works for both boys and girls. Personalizing instruction will help learners achieve at higher levels. I wonder, do boys just question authority (the teacher/school) more than girls, when the work is unrewarding? Therefore, they refuse to do “boring” work, work that is not relevant. Are girls doing better because they are more risk adverse, thus they just do the work to please and avoid conflict? Is this the best way to educate future innovators? Hard work is a great attribute, one the authors say girls have. So, teachers who provide rigorous and relevant work, with multiple pathways to mastery will find both girls and boys working hard to master the learning, because in their minds it matters.
Like or Dislike:
3
1
Great article. I do think boys can perform better, both socially and academically, if they put their minds to it. They just don’t seem to push themselves as hard as girls do.
Like or Dislike:
2
2
I think that sports, music, acting, and other “glamorous” professions are pushed on boys and not the realization that they have to have an education in order to do some of these things. Not all boys are LeBron James, Jerry Rice, Emmitt Smith, LL Cool J etc. If education was made “glamorous” to boys, I think they would put forth more effort. They think the end all to be all is playing professional sports, being the next big rapper, or whatever. It’s sad b/c I have a classroom of 9 boys and over 2/3rds think they will be the next big thing and could care less that their grades are in the toilet or close to it. It’s very sad indeed! Now, just to help them achieve is harder than keeping them in school!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
A good point is the personal contact and how valued each child feels.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Really……we needed research to tell us that boys are not as mature and develop at a slower pace then girls…my inner Homer has to state… D’oh!….
Like or Dislike:
1
0